Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4666 (2518)
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David, David Laight wrote: (Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:54:20) > Is someone having us on ???? > The suggested change will completely break interworking between systems. > > David It's probably a misplaced intention. I attempted to rationalize these common parameter values many years ago for the same reasons cited (reuse), but the WG would not have it: not even between _draft_ versions. As you point out, it is not an errata: it is a non-interoperable and drastic change in code-points. Don't worry, however, I don't think that IANA will go changing parameter values without an full RFC demanding it, which will never happen. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/