Re: M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective
Andrew Booth <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Brian, In the previous diagram there were two associations from the same ASP to two SGPs. Eventually, both associations were receiving traffic. Does anything change if the ASP has two associations to the same SGP? Andrew [email protected] wrote: ----- To: [email protected] From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Sent by: [email protected] Date: 10/07/2010 12:45PM Cc: Barry Nagelberg <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA AS override mode from SGP perspective bwilson, [email protected] wrote: (Thu, 07 Oct 2010 09:02:57) > > |<---------------- ASP Act. (RC=1) ---------------------| > |---------------- ASP Act. ACK ------------------------>| > | | | | > <<<Receiving ASPAC at SGP2 from same ASP causes change routing MSUs>>> > | | | | > ---SS7 MSU--->|------------- DATA --------------->| | > -------- SS7 MSU------------->|----------------- DATA --------------->| > | | | | All except for this last part. ASP Active to SGP2 does not necessarily have to change the routing of traffic. If you do, you should use the procedures of draft-bidulock-sigtran-corid or similar to changeback traffic to avoid missequencing. -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/ _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran