Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message

mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:20:12 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,


This is my first message here. I am involved in some SIGTRAN projects and
would like to interact with people here to give and take help.


I agree with Plotkin in that ASP1 cannot report SCON of SG1 and SG2.


I think your issue is caused by the association between ASP1 and ASP2 that I
don't not understand why it is present.


Hope that helps.


Have a little question here: How M3UA traffic is distributed between the 2
SGs? are you using loadsharing architecture or simply using 1 SG for traffic
and the other for Fault tolerancing? What about HA: do you have some backup
ASP in AS side, How many?


Thank you.


--
Best regards

Abdelkader Mosbah.

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran