Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:20:12 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, This is my first message here. I am involved in some SIGTRAN projects and would like to interact with people here to give and take help. I agree with Plotkin in that ASP1 cannot report SCON of SG1 and SG2. I think your issue is caused by the association between ASP1 and ASP2 that I don't not understand why it is present. Hope that helps. Have a little question here: How M3UA traffic is distributed between the 2 SGs? are you using loadsharing architecture or simply using 1 SG for traffic and the other for Fault tolerancing? What about HA: do you have some backup ASP in AS side, How many? Thank you. -- Best regards Abdelkader Mosbah. _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran