Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message

Hi Zoltán,


Could you please provide a little network capture.


--
BR
Abdelkader Mosbah.

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Zoltán Juhász <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Hi Mosbah,
>
> Thank you for your post.
> Yes, the network outage was serious because of direct association between
> ASP1 and ASP2. But ASP1 sent SCON to SG1 and SG2 as well. The network would
> have been suffered from traffic stoppage if this direct assoc. not existed.
>
> ASP1 uses SG1 and SG2 in loadsharing mode.
> I don't know if ASP1 has backup ASP (it is another vendor's equipment)
>
>
> Regards
> Zoltan
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* mosbah abdelkader [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:20 PM
> *To:* Zoltán Juhász
> *Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Interpretation of RFC4666 regarding M3UA SCON message
>
>  Hi all,
>
>
> This is my first message here. I am involved in some SIGTRAN projects and
> would like to interact with people here to give and take help.
>
>
> I agree with Plotkin in that ASP1 cannot report SCON of SG1 and SG2.
>
>
> I think your issue is caused by the association between ASP1 and ASP2 that
> I don't not understand why it is present.
>
>
> Hope that helps.
>
>
> Have a little question here: How M3UA traffic is distributed between the 2
> SGs? are you using loadsharing architecture or simply using 1 SG for traffic
> and the other for Fault tolerancing? What about HA: do you have some backup
> ASP in AS side, How many?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> --
> Best regards
>
> Abdelkader Mosbah.
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran