Re: [M3UA] Action on Receipt of ERROR (Sporton, Simon, VF-Group)
mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:41:49 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Arif, Thank you for your reply. Your comments are very interesting. I understand the need of a reliable sigtran link. The importance of our implementation is that: we have the full control of the implementation so we can do customization depending on the situation. Our stack (with SCTP) can be integrated easily in a distributed SS7 stack as an independant process. BR Abdelkader Mosbah. On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:26 AM, arif khan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mosbah,, > > Good error control is suggested to design the error handling keeping > in mind to" min downtime for the sigtran link connection and > congestion avoidance". > > Protocols are in place but atleast any one endpoint should have quick > detection and ability to change thier state and it should also have an > algorthim to force the peer also to change their state to behave > correctly. > Error loging is also helpful for the further improvement on the basis > of past learning but please do not accept generic error loging or > tracing......its quite dangerous. > > Regards > -arif > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran