Re: [M3UA] Action on Receipt of ERROR (Sporton, Simon, VF-Group)

mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:41:49 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Arif,


Thank you for your reply.


Your comments are very interesting. I understand the need of a reliable
sigtran link.


The importance of our implementation is that: we have the full control of
the implementation so we can do customization depending on the situation.
Our stack (with SCTP) can be integrated easily in a distributed SS7 stack as
an independant process.


BR
Abdelkader Mosbah.

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:26 AM, arif khan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Mosbah,,
>
> Good error control is suggested to design the error handling keeping
> in mind to" min downtime for the sigtran link connection and
> congestion avoidance".
>
> Protocols are in place but atleast any one endpoint should have quick
> detection and ability to change thier state and it should also have an
> algorthim to force the peer also to change their state to behave
> correctly.
> Error loging is also helpful for the further improvement on the basis
> of past learning but please do not accept generic error loging or
> tracing......its quite dangerous.
>
> Regards
> -arif
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran