Re: A question about M3UA association setup between 1 ASP and 2 SGP

Ok Brian,

Thank you.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock
<[email protected]>wrote:

> mosbah,
>
> RFC 3332 is long obsolete.  Don't use it.  Your
> implementation must meet RFC 4666 to be interoperable.
>
> --brian
>
> mosbah abdelkader wrote:                          (Thu, 14 Apr 2011
> 06:23:32)
> >    I want just to know if that config works with other implementations.
> >    On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock
> >    <[1][email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >      mosbah,
> >      What did you think was the matter with it?
> >      --brian
> >      mosbah abdelkader wrote:                     (Wed, 13 Apr 2011
> >      16:06:57)
> >
> >    >    Hi,
> >    >    I have an M3UA configuration where an ASP communicates with 2 SGP
> >    >    (STP). The file attached describes the M3UA message flow between
> >    the
> >    >    ASP and the 2 SGP.
> >    >    Is this sequence correct regarding M3UA specifications?
> >    >    I am using M3UA rfc3332.
> >    >    Please help.
> >    >    --
> >    >    Best Regards
> >    >    Abdelkader Mosbah
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran