Re: A question about M3UA association setup between 1 ASP and 2 SGP
Chris Benson <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David, >> rfc3332 doesn't work! >> A second loadsharing ASP isn't told the state. Do you mean, even if the SG/SGP fully implements all NOTIFY aspects of RFC 3332 Section 4.3.4.5? Or do you mean "it" doesn't work if the SHOULD of Paragraph 2 is taken to mean "DON'T BOTHER"? With thanks, from Chris Benson. On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, David Laight wrote: >> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:19:41 +0100 >> From: David Laight <[email protected]> >> To: mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]>, >> <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] A question about M3UA association setup between 1 ASP >> and 2 SGP >> >> > It is not a question of interoperability especially >> > if the 2 ends are using rfc3332. >> >> rfc3332 doesn't work! >> A second loadsharing ASP isn't told the state. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sigtran mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran >>