Re: A question about M3UA association setup between 1 ASP and 2 SGP

mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:29:12 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Chris,


Could you please clarify what you have understood :).

Thks.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Chris Benson <[email protected]> wrote:

> David,
>
> Please ignore my question regarding NOTIFY and SHOULD.
> I was accidentally viewing a file named rfc3332_bis
> - an early draft of RFC 4666 instead of the real 3332.
> (Thanks Andrew B.).
>
> However, this difference provides me with the information
> that probably led to your "rfc3332 doesn't work".
>
> Thanks from Chris Benson.
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Chris Benson wrote:
>
> >>  Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
> >>  From: Chris Benson <[email protected]>
> >>  To: David Laight <[email protected]>
> >>  Cc:  <[email protected]>,
> >>      mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]>,  <
> [email protected]>
> >>  Subject: Re: [Sigtran] A question about M3UA association setup between
> 1 ASP
> >>       and 2 SGP
> >>
> >>  David,
> >>
> >>  >>  rfc3332 doesn't work!
> >>  >>  A second loadsharing ASP isn't told the state.
> >>
> >>  Do you mean, even if the SG/SGP fully implements all NOTIFY
> >>  aspects of RFC 3332 Section 4.3.4.5?  Or do you mean "it"
> >>  doesn't work if the SHOULD of Paragraph 2 is taken to mean
> >>  "DON'T BOTHER"?
> >>
> >>  With thanks, from Chris Benson.
> >>
> >>  On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, David Laight wrote:
> >>
> >>  >>  Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:19:41 +0100
> >>  >>  From: David Laight <[email protected]>
> >>  >>  To: mosbah abdelkader <[email protected]>,
> >>  >>      <[email protected]>,  <[email protected]>
> >>  >>  Subject: Re: [Sigtran] A question about M3UA association setup
> between 1 ASP
> >>  >>       and 2 SGP
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  > It is not a question of interoperability especially
> >>  >>  > if the 2 ends are using rfc3332.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  rfc3332 doesn't work!
> >>  >>  A second loadsharing ASP isn't told the state.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  >>  Sigtran mailing list
> >>  >>  [email protected]
> >>  >>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >>  >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  Sigtran mailing list
> >>  [email protected]
> >>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >>
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran