Re: Interface Identifier in ASPTM message in M2UA
<[email protected]> Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:18:41 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Sandeep Singh and all, I differ from your inference of the section 3.3.2.7 (Page 36 RFC 3331). It would be in conflict to section 3.2 (Page 22 of RFC 3331) which actually defines the structure of the Interface Identifier. Section 3.3.2.7 gives an indication of the possible parameters in the ASPAC message but does not define the structure of the parameters (Of course there is an ambiguity in the RFC or rather error, wherein in section 3.2 indicates M2UA specific headers are used only with MAUP messages while they are used also with other messages like ASPSM messages). So from the structure of the Integer Interface Identifier we need to follow section 3.2 which clearly states the length value cannot be greater than 8. Regards, Rajangam ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sandeep Singh Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 5:55 PM To: [email protected]; Rajesh Makhija; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Interface Identifier in ASPTM message in M2UA Hi everybody, Thanks for your valuable inputs. It is very clear from Page 36 of RFC 3331 that the length of Interface Identifier Set having Tag (0x1) can have Length more than 8. According to the following figure, the length should be (n*4 + 4) if there are n Interface Identifiers: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag (0xb) | Length = 8 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Traffic Mode Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Tag (0x1=integer) | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ / \ \ Interface Identifiers* / / \ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Please let me know if there is anything wrong in my understanding. Best Regards, Sandeep Singh Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran