Re: Clarification regarding the IPSP behavior for ASPTM messages without RC

Vaibhav,

In the example RC values are specified and therefore a double
exchange is required.

There is no contradiction.

--brian

Vaibhav Banga wrote:                                     (Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:06:00)
>    Hi All,
> 
> 
>    I would request you to clarify regarding the IPSP D.E mode behavior for
>    ASPTM messages without RC.
> 
> 
>    According to M3UA RFC 4666 section 4.3.1 last paragraph :
> 
>    ASPTM messages.  When sending ASPTM messages to activate/deactivate
> 
>         all the traffic independently of routing keys by not specifying
>    any
> 
>         RC, a single exchange could be sufficient.
> 
> 
>    A single exchange of ASPTM messages without RC sufficient to
>    activate/deactivate the traffic.  Whereas the diagram in section 5.6.2.
>    double exchange it looks, even if RC is optional, double exchange of
>    ASPAC messages are required.
> 


-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/