Re: Clarification regarding the IPSP behavior for ASPTM messages without RC
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:38:53 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Vaibhav, Then I should point out that IPSP-DE is not recommended. Don't use it. It has all manner of problems and race conditions. It can activate an AS in one direction and fail to do so in the opposite direction. It requires brittle configuration: if configuration on both sides do no match correctly, two half activations result instead of one full one or none. IPSP-SE is recommended. Use that. --brian Vaibhav Banga wrote: (Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:54:42) > Hi Brain, > Thanks for the response. > Please confirm only single exchange of ASPTM messages are sufficient if > RC values are not specified. > Our implementation is allowing only single exchange of ASPTM messages > by not specifying RC, Where as peer implementation is expecting double > exchange even if RC values are not specified which is causing inter-op > issues. > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/