Re: [Geopriv] PLEASE TAKE NOTE: Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4480 (3121)
Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I am curious: Why you do schema validation? When you receive a PIDF document in a SIP message then you will have to parse it. Since we put any namespace="##other" statements in nearly all our schema files I am curious what you actually going to learn from the validation since almost everything validates without error. On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:11 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: > Hi, > > On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> Naturally, it would make sense to check with current implementers. In >> particular, is anyone doing schema validation? >> > > We are currently doing schema validation both on the server side (OpenXCAP, for pidf-manipulation) and client side (SIPSIMPLE SDK). > > I didn't check the details of the errata, but if it's reasonable I guess we could see if we can workaround it for a while and make the switch after a reasonable amount of time. > > > Regards, > > -- > Saúl Ibarra Corretgé > AG Projects > > > > _______________________________________________ > Geopriv mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv