Re: [Geopriv] PLEASE TAKE NOTE: Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4480 (3121)
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/16/12 1:26 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > I am curious: Why you do schema validation? > > When you receive a PIDF document in a SIP message then you will have to parse it. Since we put any namespace="##other" statements in nearly all our schema files I am curious what you actually going to learn from the validation since almost everything validates without error. Uhhh - to detect changes like this one? :-) > On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:11 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> >>> Naturally, it would make sense to check with current implementers. In >>> particular, is anyone doing schema validation? >>> >> >> We are currently doing schema validation both on the server side (OpenXCAP, for pidf-manipulation) and client side (SIPSIMPLE SDK). >> >> I didn't check the details of the errata, but if it's reasonable I guess we could see if we can workaround it for a while and make the switch after a reasonable amount of time. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé >> AG Projects >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Geopriv mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv > > _______________________________________________ > Simple mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple >