Re: SIMPLE chat: Internationalization and normalization of nicknames
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, >> >> 1) A resource part identifies something. That makes uniqueness and >> comparisons fairly important. OTOH, a nickname is really for human >> display purposes. We still need to be able to compare them for >> reservations to work. And the human readability part means we should >> at least mention character confusion issues. > > In the chatroom context, XMPP resourceparts are mostly used for display > purposes but also for some authorization decisions (e.g., we can kick > people based on their nickname). As far as I understand it, the uses are > really quite similar in XMPP chatrooms and SIMPLE chatrooms. > >> 2) The 6122bis resource parts live inside URIs, while simple-chat >> nicknames are just strings. > > Well, we don't really use URIs in XMPP. Probably you mean JIDs > (JabberIDs). In that case, yes, they are used sometimes for addressing > in XMPP chatrooms (e.g., to send a private message to another occupant). > My understanding is that a full JID is comparable with a SIP GRUU, at least from the routing perspective. I'm working on a SIP-XMPP gateway at the moment and this is the translation I'm currently applying :-) Regards, -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects