Re: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-precis-nickname-00.txt

Hi guys,

I think this draft is a very good start.

So, I believe the SIMPLE chat draft should just add one sentence with a 
normative statement pointing this draft, and we are done.

Do we all agree that this is the path forward?

/Miguel

On 05/03/2012 23:25, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 3/5/12 3:21 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/5/12 3:16 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>>>> Excellent! Thanks, Peter!
>>>>
>>>> Miguel, Geir Arne, and everyone else following this issue in SIMPLE: Does this draft meet our needs for simple-chat?
>>>
>>> This is a first pass.
>>
>> Of course--I should adjust my question to say "is this on the right track to meet our needs for simple-chat?" :-)
>
> I think it's on the right track, but I'm biased. :)
>
>>> IMHO it could be augmented with more details about
>>> the avoidance of confusable characters, but that's quite a bit more work
>>> and we need to figure out if the benefits are worth the cost.
>>
>> Agreed, and whether that decision is necessarily the same for MSRP as for XMPP.
>
> True. Even if some folks decide to go down the "avoid confusables" path,
> I think it would be optional -- something that goes above and beyond
> what is strictly necessary from a PRECIS point of view.
>
> Peter
>

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain