Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
"Miguel A. Garcia" <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:20:37 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ben, and the SIMPLE WG:
To clarify the usage of accept-types, I propose two paragraphs to Section
5.2 (Joining a chat room). The first paragraph is new and discusses the
participant's SDP. Here, I propose not to add normative text mandating
the UA to add 'a=accept-types:Message/CPIM' in SDP. The reason is that
such normative text would require a mechanism for the UA to know in
advance that it is joining a chat room, perhaps by examining the chat
room URI. But in general, such mechanism does not exist. The UA will
create an INVITE request with SDP, not knowing if at the other end there
is a chat room or a regular user. If this SDP contains 'm=message', the
attributes included afterwards will be the same, no matter whether the
participant is joining a chat room or just another endpoint. Please
verify that the proposed words are acceptable: "...needs to include at
least...
This participant's INVITE request contains an SDP body. This SDP
body includes the description of MSRP 'message' media line as per RFC
4975 procedures [RFC4975]. This specification requires all instant
messages to be wrapped in a Message/CPIM wrapper [RFC3862],
therefore, the 'accept-types' attribute for the MSRP message media in
the participant's SDP offer needs to include at least the value
'Message/CPIM', otherwise the conference focus will reject the
request. The actual instant message payload type is negotiated in
the 'accept-wrapped-types' attribute in SDP (see RFC 4975 [RFC4975]
for details). There is no default wrapped type. Typical wrapped
type values can include: text/plain, text/html, image/jpeg, image/
png, audio/mp3, etc. It is RECOMMENDED that participant endpoints
add an 'accept-wrapped-types' attribute to the MSRP 'message' media
line in SDP, where the supported wrapped types are declared, as per
RFC 4975 procedures [RFC4975].
Now, the second paragraph was already present in the previous version,
and is now divided into two paragraphs. It tackles the conference focus.
I have added text to indicate that the focus must only accept
Message/CPIM, and also that the focus should add an
'accept-wrapped-types'. The text reads:
The conference focus of a chat room MUST only use a Message/CPIM
[RFC3862] top-level wrapper as a payload of MSRP messages, and this
needs to be declared in the SDP offer and answer as per regular RFC
4975 procedures [RFC4975]. This implies that if the conference focus
receives from a participant's endpoint an SDP offer that does not
include the value 'Message/CPIM' in the 'accept-types' attribute for
the MSRP message media line, the conference focus SHOULD either
reject the MSRP message media stream or the complete SDP offer by
using regular SIP or SDP procedures (e.g., creating an SDP answer
that sets to zero the port of the MSRP message media line, responding
the INVITE with a 488 response, etc.).
If the conference focus accepts the participant's SDP offer, when the
conference focus generates the SDP answer, it MUST set the 'accept-
types' attribute for the MSRP message media line to a value of
'Message/CPIM'. This specification requires all instant messages to
be wrapped in a Message/CPIM wrapper, therefore, the 'accept-types'
attribute in this SDP body contains a single value of 'Message/CPIM'.
The actual instant message payload type is negotiated in the 'accept-
wrapped-types' attribute in SDP (see RFC 4975 [RFC4975] for details).
The conference focus SHOULD also add an 'accept-wrapped-types'
attribute to the MSRP message media line in SDP containing the
supported wrapped types.
Please indicate if there are problems with the proposed text.
/Miguel
On 07/09/2012 10:41, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
> On 06/09/2012 22:12, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> But the text talks about the what the conference focus sends, not UAs
>> in_general_. If the focus includes anything_other_ than Message/CPIM
>> in accept-types, it better be prepared to receive it. Is that the intent?
>
> Ben, I see your point. The conference focus MUST only send an
> accept-types of Message/CPIM. There is no reason for using any other value.
>
> I will revise this text to make clear the intention.
>
> BR,
>
> Miguel
--
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain