Re: nickname length
Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:18:27 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The more I think about this, the more I realize that nickname length is best left up to protocol specifications for MSRP and XMPP, not the nickname spec itself. Unless there are objections, I plan to remove the relevant paragraph from draft-ietf-precis-nickname. On 9/21/12 2:30 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Are there any limits on the length of a nickname in > draft-ietf-simple-chat? I don't see any, nor do I see any on > quoted-string in RFC 4975. In draft-ietf-precis-nickname, I have a > limit of 1023 bytes, which comes from RFC 6122 and is probably > longer than most people will ever use. I received one comment that > the nickname spec is the wrong place to be imposing such limits, > and that makes sense (XMPP can impose one limit and MSRP can impose > another limit, etc.). But I figured it would be good to check here > before making a change to draft-ietf-precis-nickname on this > point. > > Thanks! > > Peter > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBdLgMACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzpfQCdGeCGvS29+7CrMIKwzKeP4HVO vBUAnAgvo5gFc0Ksq7tpPL3UvybRFQh/ =ZMK/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----