Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?

On Oct 16, 2012, at 1:32 PM, Mary Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:

>> > Your suggestion to discuss in DISPATCH and decide if and where we want to do that work makes sense, and is what DISPATCH is for. Presumably we can do that in Atlanta.
>> 
>> I believe we're past the deadline for "official" DISPATCH agenda time for Atlanta. Mary, since you've already commented, do you have thoughts on that?
> [MB] Yes - we are past the "official" DISPATCH dates.  Although, we have a light agenda since only one topic was requested before the deadline.  We may have some extra time and pending approval from the ADs, we could have an unofficial discussion after the "official" agenda to kick this off and pursue it formally in DISPATCH in March (with the discussion focusing on a proposed charter).  I'll ping the ADs and see what they think. [/MB] 
>> 

I also assume any such discussion would be dependent on someone stepping up to lead it, right? It seems like there are really at least two things under discussion on the list: SIMPLE/XMPP inter working, and whether work is needed on SIMPLE itself in order to facilitate interoperable implementations.

Thanks,

Ben.

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple