Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?

On Oct 17, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 10/17/12 7:14 AM, Adrian Georgescu wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>> 
>> I keep this on the mailing list, hope you do not mind.
>> 
>> On Oct 17, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Brian McColgan wrote:
> 
> <snip/>
> 
>>> It seems however IETF is plowing toward an XMPP/SIP-SIMPLE 
>>> inter-work solution.  Not sure what that will achieve.
> 
> I don't know whether the IETF is plowing toward an interwork solution.
> All I know is that vendors and service providers who deploy
> SIMPLE-based systems often want to enable their users to communicate
> with users of XMPP-based systems (share presence, chat one-to-one,
> join chatrooms). If we define protocol mappings, such gateways will be
> easier to build and will work in more consistent ways. That seems like
> a good thing.
> 

Can't +1 this enough.

--
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects