Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
"Olle E. Johansson" <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:22:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
17 okt 2012 kl. 15:14 skrev Adrian Georgescu <[email protected]>: >> It seems however IETF is plowing toward an XMPP/SIP-SIMPLE inter-work solution. Not sure what that will achieve. That's fine, but a separate project. If the only way we can get interoperability between SIMPLE implentations is using XMPP between them, that feels like a stupid solution to me. I do want to be able to use SIMPLE to communicate with other SIMPLE implementations. I want to be able to use one SIMPLE client from one vendor on my smartphone and share the address book/buddy list and presence ruleset with my other SIMPLE client on the desktop. That's what customers expect. And that's not where we are today with the IETF specs, and if I parse right, maybe not with the inclusion of the 3rd party OMA specs. /O