Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:15:16 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/17/12 3:47 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > All others following this list: > > Please add your thoughts, possibly details (like IƱaki, Saul and Adrian > have done) in mail to this mailing list. With that information, we can > try to put together a document on "Issues in SIMPLE-SIMPLE > interoperability" that can be the platform for continued work to solve > issues. Pour it out to the mail archives! ISTM that SIMPLE has two clearly separate parts: presence and IM. The interop issues for the two are very different. I think most of the issues are wrt presence. This applies to both simple-simple and simple-xmpp. The one point where there is commonality is around the URIs - sip: vs. xmpp:. For instance, for simple-xmpp interop for ecrit, I think only the IM part is critical, and that should be the easier part. Thanks, Paul