Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability

Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:15:16 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.simple
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 10/17/12 3:47 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:

> All others following this list:
>
> Please add your thoughts, possibly details (like IƱaki, Saul and Adrian
> have done) in mail to this mailing list. With that information, we can
> try to put together a document on "Issues in SIMPLE-SIMPLE
> interoperability" that can be the platform for continued work to solve
> issues. Pour it out to the mail archives!

ISTM that SIMPLE has two clearly separate parts: presence and IM.
The interop issues for the two are very different. I think most of the 
issues are wrt presence. This applies to both simple-simple and simple-xmpp.

The one point where there is commonality is around the URIs - sip: vs. 
xmpp:.

For instance, for simple-xmpp interop for ecrit, I think only the IM 
part is critical, and that should be the easier part.

	Thanks,
	Paul