Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?

2012/10/16 Ben Campbell <[email protected]>:
> It seems like there are really at least two things under discussion on the
> list: SIMPLE/XMPP inter working, and whether work is needed on SIMPLE itself
> in order to facilitate interoperable implementations.

Hi Ben, some others as me propose a third vision:

Trying to revive SIMPLE for open environments (i.e. Internet) is a
no-go given the complexity of the existing specs. IMHO technical
details about this realitity have been already given during the last
mail threads, including the number of lines of high level programming
code for building all the SIMPLE specs (more than 15000, and the
result is something non interoperable with any other client or server
implementation).

A new effort 100% from scratch makes more sense for me (just my
opinion). Regards.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple