Re: XMPP servedr based presence (new subject)
"Olle E. Johansson" <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:47:22 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
18 okt 2012 kl. 20:42 skrev Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/18/12 12:01 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >> >> 18 okt 2012 kl. 18:43 skrev Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>: >> >>> I will observe that some things are, or can be, UI issues or API >>> issues rather than protocol issues. For better or worse IETF >>> doesn't do UI and API. So it's important to draw the lines >>> carefully. Or establish a partnership with another SDO that does >>> those things, like W3C, as is going on with RTCWEB/WEBRTC. >> >> Absolutely. But the requirement to be able to integrate with a UI >> may affect the protocol solution. >> >> XMPP has this problem. The XMPP server is not aware of the >> presence, it just routes stanzas. Without caching stanzas or doing >> something else, it is just not possible to create an API into the >> server and get the presence of a particular JID. > > Olle, that statement has no basis in reality. Every XMPP server > implementation on the planet is aware of the presence state for each > Jabber ID under its control. Thanks for the feedback. THat feature was not very stable when I implemented large scale XMPP a few years ago. Can I change the state in the server as well nowadays? /O