Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
"Roy, Radhika R CIV (US)" <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:36:56 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.simple |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8486C8728176924BAF5BDB2F7D7EEDDF486436A5@ucolhp9h.easf.csd.disa.mil> |
Hi, Iñaki: Great! It helps a lot because we are using SIMPLE integrating with audio and video, and SIP becomes the key signaling protocol for integration of audio, video, and chat/IM/Presence. From this view, it is urgent that we must need to solve all the problems for SIMPLE-SIMPLE interworking as soon as we can. Of course, we must learn from XMPP-XMPP interworking as much as we can and apply the same for SIMPLE-SIMPLE interworking as fast as we can. BR/Radhika -----Original Message----- From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 9:30 AM To: Roy, Radhika R CIV (US) Cc: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé; Simple WG Subject: Re: [Simple] Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop 2012/10/30 Roy, Radhika R CIV (US) <[email protected]>: > Folks: > > I do not whether when you talk about SIMPLE and XMPP, do you also talk > about integration of SIMPLE (or XMPP) with audio and video? > > Or, are you saying the following only? > > 1. Only SIMPLE-SIMPLE Interworking. > > 2. Only SIMPLE-XMPP Interworking. > > Please clarify in the mailing list. The fact is that we are trying to talk about SIMPLE-SIMPLE and not about XMPP or SIMPLE-XMPP interoperability. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Simple mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 5.5 KB) - not displayed