Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and... (new subject)

So I guess that IETF has therefore abandoned RFC 5727.

OMA last asked for 6 header fields to be registered. As far as I understand they were told they needed a standards track RFC to do this. Identifying no need for cooperation tells me that IETF is quite happy they have their own version of the SIP specification.

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 01 November 2012 20:09
> To: Ben Campbell
> Cc: Olle E. Johansson; Bernard Aboba; DRAGE, Keith (Keith);
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Simple] SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and... (new subject)
> 
> Murray was the liaison person to the OMA from the IETF side. Murray
> recently discontinued his participation in the OMA (due to a job change).
> We discussed the need to appoint a new liaison person in the IAB and came
> to the conclusion that no new appointment is necessary; the required need
> to interact with the OMA had decreased over time.
> 
> Does anyone on this list believe that there is a need for cooperation with
> the OMA?
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> Sent from my ASUS Pad
> 
> Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >
> >On Nov 1, 2012, at 2:20 PM, "Olle E. Johansson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> What is the current relationship betwen OMA and the IETF? ANy
> cooperation, like between 3Gpp and the IETF?
> >>
> >
> >
> >There is a liaison, but I don't think it's been very active for a while
> now.
> >_______________________________________________
> >Simple mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple