Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and... (new subject)

On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:00 PM, "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> So I guess that IETF has therefore abandoned RFC 5727.
> 
> I'm trying to figure out how "abandoning 5727" follows from "no liaison manager for OMA". I'm not getting it; can you elaborate?
> 
>> 
>> OMA last asked for 6 header fields to be registered. As far as I understand they were told they needed a standards track RFC to do this. Identifying no need for cooperation tells me that IETF is quite happy they have their own version of the SIP specification.
>> 
> 
> I don't think choosing not to assign a liaison manager implies we expect no cooperation. You don't need an IETF assigned liaison manager to someone bring a draft to the IETF, do you?

Okay, that was a cut-paste disaster. s/ "to someone bring" / "for someone to bring"

> 
>> Keith
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: 01 November 2012 20:09
>>> To: Ben Campbell
>>> Cc: Olle E. Johansson; Bernard Aboba; DRAGE, Keith (Keith);
>>> [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [Simple] SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and... (new subject)
>>> 
>>> Murray was the liaison person to the OMA from the IETF side. Murray
>>> recently discontinued his participation in the OMA (due to a job change).
>>> We discussed the need to appoint a new liaison person in the IAB and came
>>> to the conclusion that no new appointment is necessary; the required need
>>> to interact with the OMA had decreased over time.
>>> 
>>> Does anyone on this list believe that there is a need for cooperation with
>>> the OMA?
>>> 
>>> Ciao
>>> Hannes
>>> 
>>> Sent from my ASUS Pad
>>> 
>>> Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 1, 2012, at 2:20 PM, "Olle E. Johansson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> What is the current relationship betwen OMA and the IETF? ANy
>>> cooperation, like between 3Gpp and the IETF?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> There is a liaison, but I don't think it's been very active for a while
>>> now.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Simple mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
>