Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)

On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:27 PM, I=F1aki Baz Castillo wrote:

> 2012/11/2 Sa=FAl Ibarra Corretg=E9 <[email protected]>:
>> You misundertood. That how we did it *for now*. I never ever mentioned t=
here shouldn't be a better way nor that this is how I (personally) would li=
ke SIMPLE presence to look like. But I can't just simply implement a soluti=
on which only works with myself. Hence the backwards compatibility.
> =

> "backwards compatibility" with what?
> =


With the current specs, obviously.

> =

>> I'd love to see a better model endorsed by SIMPLE and then happily imple=
ment it. I think we do share this goal :-)
> =

> Sure we agree here. The key is: reusing SIMPLE/XCAP specs? or making
> something better from scratch (after learning from current SIMPLE/XMPP
> specs)?
> =


That's a different discussion.

--
Sa=FAl Ibarra Corretg=E9
AG Projects