Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)

On Nov 2, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:

> (as individual)
> =

> On Nov 2, 2012, at 7:27 AM, I=F1aki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> wrote:
> =

>>> I'd love to see a better model endorsed by SIMPLE and then happily impl=
ement it. I think we do share this goal :-)
>> =

>> Sure we agree here. The key is: reusing SIMPLE/XCAP specs? or making
>> something better from scratch (after learning from current SIMPLE/XMPP
>> specs)?
> =

> Do you really believe nothing is salvageable? For example, would you jett=
ison all of the below?
> =

> -- Using SIP in the first place
> -- SIP Events
> -- RLS
> -- SIP Message
> -- MSRP
> -- XCAP
> -- etc
> =

> From the discussions so far, it sounds like most of the complaints are in=
 the area of reusing user lists between clients (e.g. contact lists, presen=
ce rules, etc). Do people really hate the entire SIMPLE suite, or is it jus=
t an XCAP issue.

To narrow it down, again.

It is an XCAP issue that is related to storage of the presence rules. The S=
IP Presence Agent must be able to read it too. It should be a single docume=
nt that stores both the contacts and their policy.

This is the only really issue in my opinion.

Adrian
 =