Re: Possible bug in REGISTER 200-OK Contact specification
Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
El Jueves, 11 de Septiembre de 2008, Robert Sparks escribió: > To summarize: > > The problem text in how to construct a response to a register request is > "MAY contain a Contact header field with zero or more values" > where the right thing to do if there are no registered bindings is > return no Contact header field at all. For me is also annoying the secion 10.3 as Victor pointed: The registrar returns a 200 (OK) response. The response MUST contain Contact header field values enumerating all current bindings. At least for me, that MUST forces the existence of a Contact header. Well, I understand that it could mean "abscence" of Contact header but, will really most of the implementors interpret it? > A link to the post below is captured in the bug database at > http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=775 Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip