Re: issues on two different session policies in the draft"draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-04"

Yuxia Zhang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
volker, 
thanks a lot !

Additionally,  there are still another places  for the figure 3 and figure 4
in the draft needs to be clarified, can you ?   

As follows,

From the context,  whether should they be "policy channel
+infoOffer+InfoAnswer" for the step (9) and (10) in the figure 3 and for the
step (12) and (13) in the figure 4 in the draft?

I wonder whether it is my fault or other question, such as typo error, other
explanation:)

cheers


isal 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Volker
Hilt
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:02 AM
To: Yuxia Zhang
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sip] issues on two different session policies in the
draft"draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-04"

Yuxia Zhang wrote:
> hi, all
>  
> some issues on two diffrent session policies of draft-ietf-sip-sip 
> session policy-framework need to be queried. could you help me? thanks.
> as follow,
>  
> Producedures in the draft only describe the usage of the 
> session-specific policy, is right? so as for the session-independent 
> policy, how does UAC retrieve it?

Session-independent policies make use of the config framework
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-15) as
described in the draft.

> it is only through SUBSCRIBE request and only simple interactive, is 
> it ? Then UA will retrieve the session-indepdent immediately  when UA 
> registering himself into the network as the said in the draft that the 
> session-independent  policy always is applied before the 
> session-specific policy, is right ?
>  
The UA will get session-independent policies when setting up the
subscription using the config framework as described in section 3.2. 
Yes, session-independent policies are applied before session-specific
policies are applied.

> if my understanding is right, is it indicated that there is no collide 
> for retrieve of two different policies, then it is no necessary for 
> UAC to differentiate the two different policies, so does the policy server
?
>  
There should be no need for the UA or the policy server to differentiate
between the two policies. They are applied in the order described above.

Thanks,

Volker



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use
[email protected] for questions on current sip Use
[email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.