Re: Comments on draft-ietf-sip-body-handling-02
Eric Burger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Because it is still missing the "SHOULD minimize nesting, unless X". What is the sensible X guidance to give? On Sep 26, 2008, at 5:08 PM, [email protected] wrote: > From: "DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <[email protected]> >>> 3) Section 4.3: >>> >>> UAs SHOULD avoid unnecessarily nesting body parts because >>> doing so would, unnecessarily, make processing the body more >>> laborious for the receiver. >>> >>> I had some problem with this because it seems an impossible >>> statement to determine conformance to. Is the RFC 2119 language >>> therefore appropriate. >> >> Well, you are right that the "unnecessarily" makes it sound >> like a motherhood-and-apple-pie statement. But you could >> actually check conformance to it. If an implementation nests >> a body part without having a specific reason to do it, then >> it is not conformant. Any implementer should know why he or >> she is doing something. So, I would like to keep the >> capitalized SHOULD. In any case, if you have a strong opinion >> on this, it would not be a big deal for me to make the >> statement non-normative instead. > > The key thing we need to do is write a statement where we clearly > understand whether the implementor has chosen not to apply the > constraint. > > Is it possible to write "SHOULD NOT nest" in this case, and then > give some examples of where we might expect that to be broken. That > then gives a clear test of conformance to the requirement, and the > assessor of conformance can then decide whether breaking the SHOULD > was acceptable or not. > > Why don't we say "UAs SHOULD minimize nesting of body parts."? > > minimize --verb > 1. to reduce to the smallest possible amount or degree. > > Dale > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [email protected] for questions on current sip > Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 2.6 KB) - not displayed