Fwd: [RAI] Making RAI work better

Cullen Jennings <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.sipping,gmane.ietf.avt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm sorry for the duplicate emails but just as a FYI ... I sent the  
following email to the [email protected] list. If you want to reply, please  
do not reply to this email but go reply to the original on the rai list.

Thanks

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Cullen Jennings <[email protected]>
> Date: September 30, 2008 11:37:29 AM EDT (CA)
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [RAI] Making RAI work better
>
>
> Over the past year or so, Jon and I have heard concerns about the
> efficiency and organization of the RAI Area. We have both observed  
> that
> the larger working groups, particularly SIP and SIPPING, continue to
> have difficulty tackling some of their more complex projects. The more
> critical a document seems to be from a dependency perspective, the  
> more
> late surprises seem to emerge in its development and the longer it  
> takes
> to escape from the working group process. A relatively small number of
> the working groups in the RAI Area seem to encompass the lion's  
> share of
> our documents in their scope, which may concentrate too much of our  
> work
> in too few areas and cause distracting parallelization.
>
> Ultimately, these problems might result from any number of causes.  
> There
> might be structural problems with the manner the RAI Area is divided
> into working groups, issues with chartering or focusing of the  
> efforts,
> snarls intrinsic to the technology, personnel problems at any number
> of levels, questions of participant energy, or any of a number of
> combinations thereof.
>
> What we'd like to do is kick off a discussion about ways that we can
> make RAI work better. As a part of that discussion we are reserving  
> one
> of our precious timeslots for a RAI Area open meeting in Minneapolis  
> (at
> least the Friday afternoon experiment will give us one more slot than
> usual). In order to help set an agenda for that meeting, we'd like to
> invite any comments and discussion on this list ([email protected]),
> or if necessarily in private correspondence to Jon and I. We're
> interested to learn to what degree people believe there are problems
> that need to be addressed, and what sorts of problems and potential
> solutions the community can identify.
>
> Cullen Jennings
> Jon Peterson
> RAI Area Directors
> _______________________________________________
> RAI mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.