Re: Doubt related to URI parameters in remote-URI.

Hi,
I understand that the below questions might appear naive. However, I would
really appreciate opinion(s) on this, as this is required for my design.

Regards,
Vineet.


On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
> I have very basic doubt related to URI parameters present in remote-contact
> URI (i.e. top-most Route URI or Remote Contact URI).
>
> Case 1: The remote-URI contains URI parameters like transport=TCP and
> comp=sigcomp once INVITE dialog is established.
> a) Is it mandatory for all the requests within the dialog to have
> transport=TCP and comp=sigcomp in the via header, there forcing compression
> and TCP transport for any connection within the dialog.
> b) Can I send some request within the same dialog by retaining these
> parameter in the request-URI, but not them copying them onto the via header,
> thereby sending the request uncompressed and on UDP.
>
> Case 2:  The remote-URI does not contain any URI parameters.
> a) Can any request within the dialog be sent with any parameters like
> transport=tcp;comp=sigcomp by putting them in via header irrespective of the
> way first request within the dialog (Ofcourse, keeping the capabilities of
> remote in mind) ?
>
> In general, do the parameters in the remote URI have any binding on
> requests within the dialog?
>
>
> Regards,
> Vineet.
>

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip