Re: [Sipping] status of draft-ietf-sip-gruu-15

Dean Willis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:

> Dean Willis writes:
>
>> So what do you think is broken now?
>
> see my message a few days ago to the list.  i have read only a few
> percent of outbound text and at least this paragraph is broken:
>
>   If the UAC is sending a dialog-forming request, and wants all
>   subsequent requests in the dialog to arrive over the same flow, the
>   UAC adds an 'ob' parameter to its Contact header.  Typically this is
>   desirable, but it is not necessary for example if the Contact is a
>   GRUU [I-D.ietf-sip-gruu].  The flow used for the request is  
> typically
>   the same flow the UA registered over, but it could be a new flow,  
> for
>   example the initial subcription dialog for the configuration
>   framework [I-D.ietf-sipping-config-framework] needs to exist before
>   registration.
>

Ah. Thanks.

I'll follow that one up on the list on the thread in which it was  
raised.

> also, i'm questioning why outbound i-d does not provide a general
> solution to "usage of the same flow for in-dialog requests" problem:
>
>  outbound behavior is also needed in case of regular presence server.
>  that is why i don't quite understand is why is this "usage of the  
> same
>  flow for in-dialog requests" feature tied to outbound proxy.  why  
> is it
>  not useful to have a generic capability for UAC to tell to the next  
> hop
>  (a proxy or UAS) in its dialog initiating request that "please use  
> this
>  flow for subsequent requests of this dialog"?

It probably is useful, just as having keepalive separate from outbound  
is probably useful. If we were designing outbound from scratch, we'd  
probably break those two functions out into separate drafts, and have  
outbound use them.

Given that we can, if we find it sufficiently useful, add a generic  
connect-reuse modifier apart from outbound, Is it worth derailing  
outbound in order to fix it at this stage?

--
Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.