Re: Dual registration without Outbound

"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF05C0F894@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
Hi, 

>>I don't see any mentioning of the contact in the text above - it only
talks about instance-id.
>
>then the ua must use two instance ids (one for each contact) or
outbound i-d must be changed to allow forking if contacts >are not the
same.

I guess we would need to check whether the spec FORBIDS forking, but my
point was that I don't see any text which would REQUIRE forking for
different contacts, if the instance-id is the same.

Can I ask you, why would you want to use Outbound in you want forking to
occur?

Of course, if you don't use Outbound, you may need anohter mechanism to
negotiate support of keep-alives: the sip-keep draft provides such
mechanism :)

But, since I know that you don't think that keep-alive indicators are
needed in the first place, I guess there much be another reason why you
want to use Outbound.


Regards,

Christer


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.