Re: Dual registration without Outbound

Hi, 

>>Can I ask you, why would you want to use Outbound in you want forking
to occur?
>
>now that outbound text has been changed and it mandates UA to register
via two ob proxies if only two is given, it allows >a very simple
implementation of redundancy, because the two proxies can operate
totally independent of each other.  

That still dooesn't answer my question: why do you want forking? Why
can't the registrar simply choose ONE working flow?

And, the UA can make normal (non-outbound) registrations via each of the
two ob proxies. They will still operate indepenent of each other - and
you will get forking.

>if UA has two different contacts and if outbound i-d does not mandate
the UA to register BOTH of them with BOTH ob 
>proxies, then the above (and only benefit) of outbound i-d goes away
again, because we would again be in the situation 
>-where redundancy is lost.

Even the UA has two contacts, and registers each once (using normal reg
procedures), you will still have redundancy: if one contact doesn't work
then the registrar will try anohter.

Regards,

Christer




-- juha
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip