Re: Dual registration without Outbound

Why do I get the feeling that you won't be happy even when every UA is  
forced to register every contact it has or might obtain have with  
every registrar that ever existed or will exist ;-)?

On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:

> Dean Willis writes:
>
>> Assume a UA has two different interfaces, and it registers each of  
>> its
>> interfaces with a different proxy/registrar. Further assume that  
>> those
>> two proxy registrars collude with respect to mapping the user's AUR
>> onto those contacts.
>
> that "collude" thing is exactly what i tried to avoid.  if ua is
> required to register all of its contacts via both proxies, then
> redundancy of the service can be implemented by running the
> two proxy/registrars completely independent of each other thus greatly
> simplifying the implementation.
>
> if that requirement is not there, ob becomes totally useless again and
> there was no advantage that the text was changed according to my
> wishes.  you may as well go and change it back to what it was before.

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip