Re: Dual registration without Outbound

"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF05C0F8B7@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
Hi, 

>>And, as you say, the edge proxies may be "access network dependent",
so it may not even be possible to e.g. register the 
>>wlan contact via the 3g edge proxy, etc.
>
>So you are saying that the contact addresses are themselves access
network dependent??? So that the ip address of the 
>contact is only accessible via a particular access network and proxy?
>
>This *really* isn't the internet, is it!!!

I am not sure I understand. Typically each access network assigns IP
addresses to the UA independent from each other. The wlan network has a
no idea what IP address the 3g network assigns to the UA, and vice
versa.

Regards,

Christer



> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul
> 
> Christer Holmberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>  > So, you want to register both contacts to both registars, right?
>>  >
>>  > Example:
>>  >
>>  > UA_Contact_wlan ----- OB_1 ----- REG_1  > UA_Contact_wlan -----
>> OB_1 ----- REG_2
>>  > UA_Contact_3g   ----- OB_2 ----- REG_1
>>  > UA_Contact_3g   ----- OB_2 ----- REG_2
>>
>>> no, like this:
>>  > UA_Contact_wlan ----- OB_1 ----- REG_1  > UA_Contact_wlan -----
>> OB_2 ----- REG_2
>>  > UA_Contact_3g   ----- OB_1 ----- REG_1
>>  > UA_Contact_3g   ----- OB_2 ----- REG_2
>>
>> Now, in your example, if OB_1 and REG_2 fail you don't still don't 
>> have redundancy :)
>>
>>> if outbound does not mandate that UA must register each contact with
>> both ob proxies, my pleasant surprise was a too
>>> early one and ob draft falls back to the useless bin.
>> I don't have the spec in front of me, but I don't think it currently 
>> talks about multiple contacts.
>>
>> I guess this all comes back to Dean's question whether we need some 
>> new text into the draft.
>>
>> In order to avoid delaying the Outbound spec even more, I guess it 
>> could also be an extension draft:"Outbound with multiple contacts", 
>> or
> 
>> something like that...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Christer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- juha
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
>> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
>> [email protected] for questions on current sip Use 
>> [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> [email protected] for questions on current sip Use 
> [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.