Re: Dual registration without Outbound

Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
El Miércoles, 8 de Octubre de 2008, Paul Kyzivat escribió:

> Its certainly not an idea that appeals to me.
>
> It requires an entirely non-standard routing algorithm within the proxy,
> selecting contact URI from among the available candidates in a very
> weird way.

Yes, true.


> Its an axiom of sip that UAs may choose their contact addresses as they
> wish. The encoding of any semantic information into that address is the
> business of the UA and not for any other server to second guess.

True again.


> In your example, the same proxy is responsible for the following AORs:
> - tel:+34111111
> - tel:+34222222
> - sip:[email protected]
>
> and probably:
>
> - sip:[email protected]
> - sip:[email protected]
>
> Rather than have the UA register for [email protected] and have the proxy do
> a weird mapping based on registered contact addresses, 

Why "weird"? it could be done based on a private ENUM that maps PSTN numbers 
to SIP users without the need of having PSTN numbers as userinfo in the local 
SIP users.

I could allow a user sip:[email protected] registering for the AoR sip:
[email protected], but then I need to control in the registrar if the 
user "[email protected]" has permissions to register that AoR. IMHO it's easier if 
the mapping PSTN<->SIP is done by the proxy instead of depending on the 
users, isn't?



> its much more 
> straightforward to have the UA register as follows:
>
> REGISTER sip:domain.com
> From: sip:[email protected]
> To: sip:[email protected]
> Contact: sip:+34111111@my_ip
>
> REGISTER sip:domain.com
> From: sip:[email protected]
> To: sip:[email protected]
> Contact: sip:+34222222@my_ip
>
> (Its required to use the sip form of the AOR rather than the tel form.
> Can't have a tel as the To of a REGISTER.)
>
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul



-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.