Re: Dual registration without Outbound
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Juha Heinanen wrote: > Elwell, John writes: > > > [JRE] Yes, indeed, retention of forking is very important. With RFC > > 3261, multiple UAs can register and incoming requests will be forked to > > them. With sip-outbound, this is still the case, provided these multiple > > UAs choose different instance IDs. This still holds true if two UAs are > > implemented in the same device, e.g., in your example, a dual mode > > device would have a GPRS UA with one instance ID and a WLAN UA with a > > second instance ID. > > see my previous email. i don't want two UAs, but like today, only one > that has two contacts. > What requires there to be two "real" UAs to have two instance-id values? A single UA with two interfaces and one instance-id per interface seems reasonable to me. It's also reasonable that that UA might have two different interfaces that share an instance-id. It's really a choice between different deployment scenarios. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip