Re: Dual registration without Outbound

(As individual)

At the moment, it may be that there is a useful information or BCP that
could back the existing mechansisms up, but I am not seeing in this
thread at the moment a significant justification for a new extension.

And of course such an informational or BCP would only exist if someone
volunteered to draft one.

Regards

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Willis
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 3:10 PM
> To: Christer Holmberg
> Cc: Bob Penfield; [email protected]; Paul Kyzivat; Elwell, John
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Dual registration without Outbound
> 
> 
> On Oct 17, 2008, at 3:08 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The please-perform-parallel-forking-to-the-same-intance-id 
> extension 
> > indication would then be brought as a separate draft.
> >
> 
> Do we need such an extension when there is a workaround -- 
> using different instance-id?
> 
> --
> Dean
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> [email protected] for questions on current sip 
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip