Re: Stupid question on flow use in outbound

"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF087C463A@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
Hi, 

>Assume Bob's UA is using outbound and is registered with two flows.  
>Both flows use the same instance-id. The first flow goes through edge-
proxy 1 and has reg-id 1. The second flow goes through proxy 2 and has
reg-id 2.
>
>Both flows are "live" from a keepalive perspective.
>
>Alice calls Bob.
>
>Which flow gets exercised?
>
>Where in Outbound is this described? If it is not in Outbound, is it
described somewhere else? If it is simply left-to-the-implementation,
does this need to be explained somewhere?

I guess it is (for good or bad) left-to-the-implementation.

HOWEVER, one thing which has been discussed, and which I think we SHOULD
say something about, is whether it's allowed to use a different set of
user capabilities for each flow.

Personally I think it would be useful. For example, I could indicate
that I want to receive incoming video calls over my super-fast-broadband
access, instead of my slow jungle-drum access.

I don't think we would need very much text for this either. Maybe a note
saying something like:

"NOTE: A user MAY register different set of user capabilities (using the
mechanism in [ref-to-RFC3840] on each flow, if the user wishes the
registrar to choose a particular flow based on caller preferences
[ref-to-RFC3841]."

...or something like that.

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.