Hi,
Christer Holmberg wrote:
>>
>>But I suppose we are talking about networks where some B2BUAs will get
>confused if you try the media from a different IP address from
>where you do SIP (although if you have something like a
>>carrier grade NAT between the UA and the B2BUA there is no guarantee
>that SIP and RTP would come from the same IP). Perhaps it
>would be good enough to use two different instance id's?
>
>It doesn't have to be a B2BUA. It can be any kind of "gate
>control node"
>which will not allow media to pass unless there is an
>associated SIP session.
>
Yes, but I think such a node will need some information about SIP
sessions and that is given by a B2BUA-ish element (since it needs to dig
into SDP). But OK, the bottom line is that some folks claim they want to
deploy SIP in such a way that media and signaling are strongly
associated like that. Do you know if a lot of them are *really* doing it
too?
>Regards,
>
>Christer
>
Markus
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.