Re: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: CANCEL???

Cut-and-paste error.

On Oct 22, 2008, at 3:56 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I have the same question as Paul.
>
> Also, I wonder whether the paragraph is needed in the first place. I
> think INFO should follow the normal 3261 procedures as far as CANCEL  
> is
> concerned.
>
> I also doubt that a UAS would send a 1xx response for an INFO, and
> without that you can't CANCEL, right?
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Paul Kyzivat
> Sent: 21. lokakuuta 2008 17:46
> To: SIP IETF; Eric Burger
> Subject: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: CANCEL???
>
> I have a question regarding the following paragraph:
>
>    A UAC MAY CANCEL an INFO request.  A UAS receiving a CANCEL for an
>    INFO request SHOULD respond to the INFO with a "487 Request
>    Cancelled" response unless the UAC has already sent a final
> response.
>    The UAS then MUST ignore future INFO requests.
>
> Why would the CANCEL affect *future* info requests???
>
>
> 	Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use
> [email protected] for questions on current sip Use
> [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip