Re: SIPit23 Survey Notes
Klaus Darilion <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Robert! Robert Sparks schrieb: > > 19% supported SIP over IPSec What do you mean with "SIP over IPSec"? Every protocol runs over IPSec as it is transparent to the application. > I asked where people were taking bits from messages to display as > caller-id. > There were many different kinds of answers, including > P-Asserted-Identity if present, then From > From display name > username part of From uri > P-Asserted-Identity only > Contact uri > Remote IP address > P-Asserted-Identity, then Remote-Party-ID, then From > From, then Remote-Party-ID, then P-Asserted-Identity So, if the From header is missing ???, the other headers are used? thanks for the summary Klaus _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip