Re: SIPit23 Survey Notes

On Oct 24, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:

> Hi Robert!
>
> Robert Sparks schrieb:
>> 19% supported SIP over IPSec
>
> What do you mean with "SIP over IPSec"? Every protocol runs over  
> IPSec as it is transparent to the application.
Thomas answered this already.
>
>
>> I asked where people were taking bits from messages to display as  
>> caller-id.
>> There were many different kinds of answers, including
>> P-Asserted-Identity if present, then From
>> From display name
>> username part of From uri
>> P-Asserted-Identity only
>> Contact uri
>> Remote IP address
>> P-Asserted-Identity, then Remote-Party-ID, then From
>> From, then Remote-Party-ID, then P-Asserted-Identity
>
> So, if the From header is missing ???, the other headers are used?
Yeah - each row represented an ordered set - if the first thing in the  
row was present, it was used, otherwise, the next thing was looked  
for, and so on...
>
>
> thanks for the summary
> Klaus

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip