Re: SIPit23 Survey Notes
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 24, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Thomas Froment wrote: > Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Hi Robert! >> >> Robert Sparks schrieb: >>> >>> 19% supported SIP over IPSec >> >> What do you mean with "SIP over IPSec"? Every protocol runs over >> IPSec as it is transparent to the application. > Well, SIP over IPsec is not really "transparent" to the SIP > implementation: > when you want to send a request over an IPSec SA, you MUST be able > to choose what is the source interface / source port and destination > interface / destination port. This is not something so easy to > implement at SIP transport level. That depends. For example, if you're running SIP over tunnel-mode IPSec, there is no impact at all to SIP. So clearly, you mean something else by "SIP over IPSec". What do you mean? Is this something that we need an RFC to define so that we can say "RFC XXXX" instead of "SIP over IPSec"? -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip