Re: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: Content-Type vs Info-Package [was RE: draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: multiple packages per INFO]
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 24, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > Hi, > >>> [Christer] I agree that a package could be associated with a >>> number of >>> content types. But, since the Info-Package header shows which >>> package is included, I just wonder why we can't use a common C-T >>> mime. >>> >> >> Then which of the multiple bodies, each of which carries the same C-T >> mime marking, is which? Are you relying on ordering? > > Let's assume BOTH bodies contain C-T: image/jpeg. How do you know > which is associated with the info package? > So you have a multipart body, with one or more parts related to an INFO package, and other parts related to something else, such as AIB, E2M, etc. Right? The content-disposition of the body parts related to INFO packages needs to differentiate them from the other body parts. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip