Re: submission of a new I-D: "Dialog Event foR Identity VErification"

Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
El Sábado, 25 de Octubre de 2008, Victor Pascual Ávila escribió:

> The
> UAS verifies the "From" header by subscribing to the Dialog Event
> package [RFC 4235] at the AOR in the "From" header field.  If the
> entity calling is registered under this AOR, it will confirm that it
> is calling by sending some valid dialog state.  In this case, the
> identity of the caller is considered to be verified.

A question about caller privacy:

I hope this mechanims doesn't requiere that 'anyone' can subscribe to the call 
status of 'anyone'. This is:

   Alice    Proxy 1 (atlanta.com)    Proxy 2 (biloxi.com)    Bob

In order this draft to work, Alice must allow a SUBSCRIBE (Event: dialog) from 
Bob, but why should Alice allow Bob monitorizing *all* her calls?

So, Alice or Proxy 1 should just allow SUBSCRIBE (Event: dialog) from Bob if 
the Event header includes 'call-id' and 'to-tag' parameters, i.e:

  Event: dialog;[email protected];to-tag=9fxced76sl

If not, Alice or Proxy 1 should deny the request with "403 Forbidden".

I know that this draft doesn't involve authorization requeriments, but in a 
real world how would the privacy mechanism be achieved? I suggest that a 
proxy should allow SUBSCRIBE (Event: dialog) for its local users just if the 
Event header includes 'call-id' and 'to-tag' parameters. Also, dialog event 
package is commonly implemented at proxy level with a presence agent instead 
of forwarding the SUBSCRIBE's to the UA's.

In this manner, a default policy in a proxy would allow this draft mechanism 
working without exposing local users privacy. Would it be the correct way?


PD: Thanks for proposing a feasible solution instead of proposing exotic 
specifications that depend on other specifications which nobody implement.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.