Re: submission of a new I-D: "Dialog Event foR Identity VErification"

Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dean Willis wrote:
> 
> On Oct 25, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Victor Pascual Ávila wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A new I-D, draft-kuthan-sip-derive-00, was just submitted. Your
>> comments are always welcome.
> 
> Sounds like you have reinvented identd, which has pretty much vanished 
> from the Internet because it was found to not really add any useful 
> authentication.
> 
> See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ident
> 
> So tell me, how is this operationally different from IDENT?

I'm actually not sure how this comparison holds, perhaps because IDENT
vanished from the Internet before I noticed it was there. I think the
email verification is a better example in that a) it works b) it is
massively used c) it is protocol-specific as opposed to being
a universal instance.

-jiri


> 
> -- 
> Dean
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.