Re: submission of a new I-D: "Dialog Event foR Identity VErification"
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dean Willis wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Victor Pascual Ávila wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> A new I-D, draft-kuthan-sip-derive-00, was just submitted. Your >> comments are always welcome. > > Sounds like you have reinvented identd, which has pretty much vanished > from the Internet because it was found to not really add any useful > authentication. > > See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ident > > So tell me, how is this operationally different from IDENT? I'm actually not sure how this comparison holds, perhaps because IDENT vanished from the Internet before I noticed it was there. I think the email verification is a better example in that a) it works b) it is massively used c) it is protocol-specific as opposed to being a universal instance. -jiri > > -- > Dean > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [email protected] for questions on current sip > Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip